I got my copy of No Impact Man in the mail yesterday - a gift from my Anna who got it signed for me for my birthday.I have been following writer Colin Beavan since he started his blog - which led to the book and then to a movie - and have enjoyed it a lot. Beavan's quest, to have no negative environmental impact for a year, has faced a lot of criticism from mainstream and even not-so- mainstream media since he began it. Since his book came out - with quite a bit of fanfare - some of my most "environmental" friends have regarded it cynically.
First off, he is a writer by trade, looking for something to write about at a profit - not unlike Henry Thoreau tried at Walden as this article in the New Yorker points out. Second, though his blog-writing didn't seem strident to me (I'm just starting the book), he clearly believes and states strongly that our personal lifestyles choices make a difference. Besides the fact that systemic change has to happen along with the personal (although this piece in Orion implies that it should happen instead of), I think the part of what turns us off is guilt. We don't like that feeling, and folks like Beavan can create it by insisting that our grandchildren's lives depend on us changing our lifestyles. Third, he's an extremist, a "hot dog" as my father would say, pulling a "stunt," doing the impossible for a limited time and boasting about it. No one likes these types, although I suspect we may envy them a little.
But I can't help it; I like him. Yes, his experiment is full of inconsistencies: he eschews electricity, yet plugs in his laptop elsewhere; he turns off his heat, but doesn't go cold because his home is heated adequately by surrounding apartments, his wife apparently smuggled in ice cubes from the neighbor's... But in his effort to reach his no impact goal, he (and his family) ate only regional foods, climbed countless flights of stairs, navigated the big city without taxi, bus, or subway, used cloth diapers, didn't use disposable anything. They didn't use toilet paper for Pete's sake! Does this kind of extremism turn most people off - setting him aside as a lunatic or a saint? Or can it wake us up to possibilities in our own lives?
For me, it's the latter; and I hope it is for others too. I think
there's a place for all kinds of environmental work. A good critique of
Beavan's year was that he went it alone, didn't organize his fellow
apartment dwellers to lower the excessive and wasteful over-heating of
their building, or organize people to lobby their members of congress.
Organizing is absolutely necessary to make any change at
all in a status quo that benefits the rich and powerful, and I support
those people doing it. But how to get more people - a critical mass -
on board and organized when so many are too busy with their own
personal status quos to care? I like to think people like Colin Beavan
reach some of those people and, by their extreme stance, pull people a
little more toward understanding the gravity of the situation and the
possibilities.